incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Maven [Was: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code]
Date Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:58:46 GMT
Very good.  Will do.

On 6/2/13 4:49 AM, "Paulo Pires" <pjpires@ubiwhere.com> wrote:

>The merge is done. Would be great if people could take a look and
>double-check it at https://github.com/pires/wave.
>
>Michael, thanks for your support. Perhaps a good start would be to
>continue the package/module renaming and revisit the open issues.
>
>Cheers,
>PP
>
>Em 2013-06-01 23:32, Michael MacFadden escreveu:
>> Another benefit of maven is that it can automate some of the release
>> processes in terms of generating the tar-ball and tagging SVN.
>>
>> On 5/31/13 3:17 PM, "Angus Turner" <angusisfree@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Paulo,
>>>I want to thank you for all your hard work on getting this done. Once
>>>you've gotten all the changes synced up, it'd be good to get a diff
>>> on
>>>reviewboard so comments can be made. Obviously this is too late for
>>> our
>>>first release, but it'd be great to get it ready for next release.
>>>
>>>Anything that makes the codebase easier to understand and follow is a
>>> big
>>>+1 from me
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Angus Turner
>>>angusisfree@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Paulo Pires <pjpires@ubiwhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Page where Maven module structure is discussed can be found at
>>>> https://github.com/pires/wave/wiki/WiaB-Maven-Module-Organization
>>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Paulo Pires <pjpires@ubiwhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Right now, I have this https://github.com/pires/wave
>>>> >
>>>> > I'll be merging latest changes during the day, but this is enough
>>>> for
>>>> you to fiddle with.
>>>> >
>>>> > Also, I had only one issue with JDK7, that I eventually fixed in
>>>>
>>>>https://github.com/pires/wave/commit/34e44e1dfb0ac6e7820f4d4b71fe05837e
>>>>fe
>>>>d960
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > PP
>>>> >
>>>> > On May 30, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Dave <wave@glark.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 30/05/13 18:45, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>>>> >>> If we have some interests, I would be more than happy to
>>>> re-engage
>>>> with PP
>>>> >>> and get that maven transition done.  While it's not a huge step
>>>> I
>>>> think it
>>>> >>> will entice developers.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> My experience has been that Maven can be a bit of a Marmite
>>>>transition
>>>> - some people love it, some people hate it. Personally, I'm quite
>>>> fond
>>>>of
>>>> Maven, but I've certainly never been put off using or contributing
>>>> to a
>>>> project because it uses ant.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> However clearer structure & modularising the codebase is
>>>> something
>>>>that
>>>> I'm sure everyone would support, whatever build framework we use.
>>>> With
>>>>our
>>>> limited resources, would it be wise to focus on these initially?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I don't really have a say in the matter, but while I'd be quite
>>>> happy
>>>> to see a transition to Maven, I'm not sure it's a particularly
>>>> pressing
>>>> issue for the project at the moment.  Sort of organising the
>>>> deckchairs
>>>>on
>>>> the titanic? ;-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dave
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>
>-- 
>Paulo Pires
>Ubiwhere



Mime
View raw message