incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview
Date Tue, 04 Jun 2013 02:45:23 GMT
Awesome, I'll make a request removing the unnecessary stuff.

Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisfree@gmail.com


On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:

> I understand now.  If you look here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/
>
> You can see that the site has its own repo.  We could easily make a repo
> call whitepapers or something to that effect, which would contain the
> source and build files.  We can then built them and post them to the site
> somewhere.  We can figure out the details.  For now, since they are on the
> wave-protocol site, I would simply remove them from out main source repo.
>
> ~Michael
>
> From: Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, June 3, 2013 7:31 PM
> To: Michael MacFadden <michael.macfadden@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
>
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview
>
> I was going to leave the protocol and whitepaper stuff on the
> wave-protocol site, as they are formatted nicely there and that really is
> protocol stuff that should be separate from WIAB. I was going to suggest a
> github repo to keep the make files for this seperate from WIAB once again.
>
> I don't have any preferences, just I think that those files should be
> located outside of the release repo. There is also another folder which is
> docs/ which contains the images for the various tutorials which are now
> located on the wiki, not sure what we wanted to do with that either.
>
> Thanks
> Angus Turner
> angusisfree@gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am following this. My on question was the part about a git hub repo.
>> What was that for.
>>
>> My opinion would be, let's just move everything over to the wave site.
>> Once it is all there, then I will take down the wave protocol stuff. I
>> would rather have it duplicated until we are happy with the new site.
>>
>> ~Michael
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > Michael,
>> >
>> > I believe you are the one in control of the wave-protocol site
>> currently.
>> >
>> > Comments on this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > On 3 June 2013 23:41, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Note I'd be willing to set all this up if someone can give me write
>> access
>> >> to the wave-protocol site...
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Angus Turner
>> >> angusisfree@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol specs
>> and the
>> >>> whitepapers on the protocol website. Maybe we need someone with commit
>> >>> access to that site to leave all the protocol stuff up and delete the
>> rest,
>> >>> and create a github repo or something to host the build files.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Angus Turner
>> >>> angusisfree@gmail.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes, we can move spec/ and whitepapers/ to the website if that is
>> better.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You might want to consider how they sat on the waveprotocol site
>> >>>> (along with some other documents not included in spec/whitepapers):
>> >>>> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol.
>> >>>> (And whether we should have those other documents on the site as
>> well?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ali
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>>>> Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing the white paper
>> folders
>> >>>>> yet. Just a sudden brainwave. Can we include those folders in
the
>> >>>>> website repo?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>> >>>>> From: Ali Lown
>> >>>>> Sent: 4/06/2013 7:40 AM
>> >>>>> To: Angus Turner; Ali Lown; wave
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> >>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/#review21362
>> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ship it!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks for this, though you didn't really need to file a
>> >>>>> review-request for since, since I was just going to do it when
I
>> next
>> >>>>> went to work on the release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> - Ali Lown
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Angus Turner wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> >>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/
>> >>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> (Updated June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m.)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Review request for wave.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Description
>> >>>>>> -------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Removes requestreview as per mailing list discussion.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Diffs
>> >>>>>> -----
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  /request_codereview 1489182
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Testing
>> >>>>>> -------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> n/a
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Angus Turner
>> >>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message