incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pratik Paranjape <pratikparanj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3
Date Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:06:24 GMT
+1

tested on Ubuntu 12.10.


On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:

> Posting the message on the right thread this time hopefully.
>
> I did test the latest RC on OSX. I also looked through the licensing and
> the packaging.
>
> +1
>
> ~Michael
>
> > I tested the real ease candidate on OSX.  I also looked through the
> > packaging.  I give it a +1.
>
> ~Michael
>
> On Jun 9, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > +0
> >
> > This is an unusual vote for me which I must explain. For non-incubator
> > PMC members, your vote says you've done your best, which is plenty good
> > enough. For me as an incubator PMC member, I would be stating that I
> > have reviewed it according to the release standards which, due to
> > insufficient knowledge I cannot do.
> >
> > Therefore I am voting +0 to say I am supportive of the effort that has
> > been done here, believe the right things to have been done, but would
> > rather defer to a more knowledgable Incubator PMC member when it comes
> > to a formal vote.
> >
> > Fell free to include the above sentence in the vote summary.
> >
> > I will also make this point on the incubator vote thread when it comes.
> > Perhaps this vote is the one where *I* get up to speed on Apache
> > licensing.
> >
> > Upayavira
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> +1 (IPMC)
> >>
> >> I didn't find anything else so far which is problematic. My guess is,
> >> other IPMC members will find something (first releases are worst)
> >>
> >> I checked on licenses, signatures, sha and looked around. I didn't do
> >> technical checks, like running the server or so. My take on pre 1.0
> >> version is, they are unstable. So I would not block a release when
> >> something crashes or so.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Christian
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <al@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Lets try again with this then...
> >>>
> >>> Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here:
> >>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/
> >>>
> >>> This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at:
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/
> >>>
> >>> A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at:
> >>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES
> >>> and included in the tarballs.
> >>>
> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013.
> >>>
> >>> [  ] +1   Release these artifacts
> >>> [  ] +0   OK, but...
> >>> [  ] -0    OK, but really should fix...
> >>> [  ] -1    I oppose this release because...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>> Ali
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------
> >>> The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from
> >>> the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other
> >>> committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is
> >>> negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to
> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on
> >>> this process.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> https://www.timeandbill.de
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message