incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pratik Paranjape <pratikparanj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future of Apache wave [Was: Re: Advantages of P2P messaging?]
Date Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:40:20 GMT
XMPP is what making servers federate in current code Bruno. Setting up
prosody etc...

http://wave-protocol.googlecode.com/hg/spec/federation/wavespec.html


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
stenyak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is XMPP involved in the connection of Mobile devices in wiab or the defunct
> google wave?
> Or are you thinking about a future when wave has already become a P2P
> software?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The general consensus was that XMPP had to much overhead to be practical
> > in anything theory than highly connected environments for lively
> > collaboration.  As bandwidth trails off, and/or you don't have persistent
> > TCP connections (I.e. Mobile devices).  XMPP was killing the ability for
> > lively collaboration.
> >
> > On 6/12/13 3:02 PM, "Dave" <wave@glark.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >On 12/06/13 14:48, Yuri Z wrote:
> > >> But without XMPP you would need to define your own discovery protocol.
> > >
> > >Yes. And implement alternatives for a couple of other bits such as
> > >stream encryption, and anti-spoofing (such as dialback).
> > >
> > >Nothing particularly tricky, although personally I don't think it's
> > >worthwhile. There's a lot of XMPP specs and implementations that we
> > >don't use, and our use of XMPP might be unusual, but I don't think it's
> > >unreasonable.
> > >
> > >
> > >Dave
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Saludos,
>      Bruno González
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
> http://www.stenyak.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message