incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Lown <...@lown.me.uk>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:06:49 GMT
The exact command was: 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'

On 6 June 2013 11:05, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> That would be because it is a SHA512 as was recommended for newer
> releases in one of the many documents.
>
> This would be noted on the download page where links to signatures are
> made, so shouldn't be a problem.
>
> Ali
>
> On 6 June 2013 11:02, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a problem with the SHA1 files, not sure if it is my fault.
>>
>> $ openssl sha1 /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip
>> SHA1(/Users/cy/Documents/release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip)=
>> dc3970d589b4db222b2672bae6a3bff4830b07e3
>>
>> $ cat /release-checking/apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip.sha
>> apache-wave-bin-0.4-incubating.zip: 788E8758 3257C62F B845615F 7F018567 0D6CC1DB
>>                                     3824C549 E281BC2F B14EF768 FB40F127 D4CE227E
>>                                     0489A6C8 7071CC0F 5B19D0DE D5E2B6DD A9EA17DD
>>                                     A841548E
>>
>> If it would be just the formatting, i would be not so concerned so
>> much, but the number is simply not identical.
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <al@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Lets try again with this then...
>>>
>>> Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here:
>>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/
>>>
>>> This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/
>>>
>>> A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at:
>>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES
>>> and included in the tarballs.
>>>
>>> Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013.
>>>
>>> [  ] +1   Release these artifacts
>>> [  ] +0   OK, but...
>>> [  ] -0    OK, but really should fix...
>>> [  ] -1    I oppose this release because...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Ali
>>>
>>> ---------------------------
>>> The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from
>>> the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other
>>> committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is
>>> negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on
>>> this process.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de

Mime
View raw message