incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.4 based on RC3
Date Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:48:22 GMT
+0 

This is an unusual vote for me which I must explain. For non-incubator
PMC members, your vote says you've done your best, which is plenty good
enough. For me as an incubator PMC member, I would be stating that I
have reviewed it according to the release standards which, due to
insufficient knowledge I cannot do. 

Therefore I am voting +0 to say I am supportive of the effort that has
been done here, believe the right things to have been done, but would
rather defer to a more knowledgable Incubator PMC member when it comes
to a formal vote.

Fell free to include the above sentence in the vote summary.

I will also make this point on the incubator vote thread when it comes.
Perhaps this vote is the one where *I* get up to speed on Apache
licensing.

Upayavira

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1 (IPMC)
> 
> I didn't find anything else so far which is problematic. My guess is,
> other IPMC members will find something (first releases are worst)
> 
> I checked on licenses, signatures, sha and looked around. I didn't do
> technical checks, like running the server or so. My take on pre 1.0
> version is, they are unstable. So I would not block a release when
> something crashes or so.
> 
> Cheers
> Christian
> 
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ali Lown <al@apache.org> wrote:
> > Lets try again with this then...
> >
> > Wave 0.4 RC3 is available for review here:
> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/
> >
> > This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc3 at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/
> >
> > A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at:
> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES
> > and included in the tarballs.
> >
> > Votes, please. This vote will close at 2000 GMT 8-June 2013.
> >
> > [  ] +1   Release these artifacts
> > [  ] +0   OK, but...
> > [  ] -0    OK, but really should fix...
> > [  ] -1    I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Ali
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > The 'minor note' again for those still confused: Only votes from
> > the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other
> > committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is
> > negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on
> > this process.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de

Mime
View raw message