incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Blossom <>
Subject Re: NodeJS for Sever-Side Wave Code
Date Thu, 30 May 2013 17:41:28 GMT

Specific to my objectives RE your skills, I would appreciate a hand with
making a kick-butt video for the Wave pitch. Not now, but at the right time.

RE the right tool for some of the project communications, I have to say it,
some of these processes might work really well in Wave...just sayin'.


All the best,

John Blossom

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Wrobel <> wrote:

> Is there any suggested way to organize volunteers?
> I know the current method is basically a "todo" list isnt it? which is fine
> in itself.
> But possibly having a list of commiters together with notes of their
> skillset could also help.
> I can, for example do the following;
> * client side GWT coding.
> * Android/Java coding
> * php
> * 3d graphics and animations (possibly to help presentations/diagrams)
> * film editing
> * html
> I haven't a clue when/if any of these things would be usefull - but I
> wouldn't mind being put on a list for anyone to contact if Wave related
> help is needed in those areas.
> >
> > Forget node.js or any other "world-changer-wannabe" frameworks. As
> Michael
> > states, most developers don't understand (or are even scared of) this
> > project architecture/structure. Fixing this would be a great start!
> >
> +1
> >
> > I tried to contribute to Wiab, a pretty simple UI modification, and I
> found
> > myself lost in the code a few hours, nagging poor yuri with questions,
> > before I could do anything simple (being new to modern web development,
> > gwt, etc was of no help either).
> >
> +1
> I also tried to do the same thing. Despite being very familiar with both
> Java and GWT, and a few web-apps behind me, I still struggled.
> I haven't seen the codebase in almost a year now, however.
> Would it benefit from some very simple first better
> commenting? removing redundant/legacy stuff?
> If separating the client is a step too big for anyone to commit too right
> now, there might still be more basic messures to help move the existing
> codebase to something easier to deal with.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message