incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Blossom <>
Subject Re: Moving Wave Forward
Date Wed, 29 May 2013 20:17:48 GMT
Thanks, Upayavira. With that in mind, I'd be grateful for views from this
group and perhaps others in ASF as to how best to move forward with
branding and product management for client-side components.

I think that the challenge here is that rebuilding the Wave brand in the
eyes of developers, platform implementers and users will take significant
effort. So whatever ASF does, renewed commitment to both development and
commercial success need to be fostered strongly. Realistically, without the
sponsorship of major commercial interests, some initial funding under some
banner may be required to make that happen, which I know does not fit into
the ASF foundation structure. This is where a presence,
managed however people feel is appropriate, may help both Apache and Wave.
There's no easy answer to this, I reckon, and I have very limited resources
myself - only the willingness to help make things happen and some marketing
and management skills, market presence and ability to communicate that may,
hopefully, be of use to this effort. I see great potential for Wave, and in
the people in the incubator project and beyond it who would benefit greatly
from coming together to make it happen. If I can be of service to this
effort, that is good.



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Upayavira <> wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 07:04 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> > Upayavira,
> >
> > You raise a very interesting point with OpenOffice. I note that there is
> > an
> > Web site to help promote this product. Wave would benefit
> > from a similar branded domain. is owned by Google, so as a part
> > of
> > this greater exercise it would help if the appropriate body were to take
> > over that domain, if Google were inclined to do so. That would certainly
> > help to align the marketing of Wave appropriately with other open source
> > platforms.
> >
> > I can see where this could work out well, and that Apache could provide a
> > suitable framework. The one difference that I'd like to have people
> > consider is that whereas OpenOffice focuses on a specific product, what
> > we're proposing for Wave is a platform that would enable multiple client
> > products to be developed - as well as "demo" apps, presumably for both PC
> > and mobile devices. From that perspective, a hypothetical might
> > wind up being a hybrid of and
> > includes
> > links to popular distributions, education and opportunities for Linux
> > partner organizations such as Ubuntu to promote their products and
> > services. So if that sort of thing seemed to fit into the ASF framework,
> > then perhaps that's a good solution. I am not sure how the administration
> > of OpenOffice works within the Apache framework, so if you could forward
> > a
> > link to appropriate information I'd be glad to educate myself.
> OpenOffice came into Apache as a very mature project with its own
> domain. Generally, Apache projects are encouraged to use a
> $ domain name - wave would be
> upon graduation.
> I recognise that Apache would likely only be responsible for reference
> implementations, whether client or server.
> Upayavira

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message