incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lennard de Rijk <lenn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maven Group Id
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:54:45 GMT
Hi Michael,

I found wave.wiab a bit confusing since that's wave."wave-in-a-box". That
was all, I'd be okay with almost anything :).

- Lennard

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lennard,
>
> I am fine with box.  Why don't you like wiab?  I just want to understand
> the concern.  I as because I was thinking that we might make the released
> artifact named something like
>
> "wiab-server-1.0.zip"
>
> I think for the released artifact, the product is called Wave in a Box,
> not just box.  I am fine with box though for the group id.  What do you
> think?
>
> ~Michael
>
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> > michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> We are selecting the top level maven group id and wanted to get some
> >> feedback.  There are two thoughts:
> >>
> >>
> >> 1) Very top level group id.  I am thinking that everything coming out of
> >> the apache wave project could be:
> >>
> >> org.apache.wave
> >>
> >>
> >> 2) Wave in a Box group id  I am thinking potentially:
> >>
> >> org.apache.wave.wiab
> >>
> >>
> > I would go with box instead of wiab.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> The rationale being the long term we hope that the wave project might
> >> produce gadgets robots, extensions and stuff beyond just wiab.  We have
> not
> >> discussed the final module structure under this namespace.
> >>
> >> Comments welcome.
> >>
> >> ~Michael
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message