incubator-wadi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jules Gosnell <ju...@coredevelopers.net>
Subject Re: [wadi-dev] WADI configuration...
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:28:38 GMT
James Goodwill wrote:

> Jules,
>
> Just wanted to touch base and let you know where I am. At the moment,  
> I am heads down finishing the SourceBeat.com site. I hope to have it  
> completed by the end of the week and then start devoting time again  
> to WADI. I have not looked into XBean yet, but I do know that you can  
> attach to spring life cycle methods on both init and destroy of the  
> BeanFactory. I think this would do what we are looking for, but I  
> will look into XBean either way-cover the bases and all.
>
OK. No problem. I have been snowed under myself. I look forward to 
hearing about your findings.

Thanks, James,

Jules

> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
>
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>
>> James Goodwill wrote:
>>
>>> I am working on a project pretty heavily over the next couple of   
>>> days, but I would be glad to take a look. I will start by looking   
>>> into the life cycle of a pojo using xbean and then get back with  
>>> you.  How does that sound?
>>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> That sounds great :-)
>>
>> I look forward to hearing about your findings.
>>
>> Specifically, we are interested in :
>>
>> - lifecycle support, with a view to intercepting construction and  
>> destruction or start/stop
>> - registering and deregistering the POJO with container services  via 
>> these interceptors
>> - compatibility with Spring (our current approach)
>> - support for Geronimo (interceptor to perform above for JMX or  
>> Geronimo?)
>> - the future of XBean and Geronimo - will XBean become the Geronimo  
>> kernel ?
>> - anything else that fires your imagination....
>>
>> thanks for picking this one up,
>>
>>
>> Jules
>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2006, at 4:39 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> One issue that I have come across with the LWC approach so far  
>>>>> is  that of lifecycle - Spring is able to register POJOs with  
>>>>> the  container on construction, but deregistering them on  
>>>>> destruction  is trickier, since Spring (at the moment) is not  
>>>>> really involved  in the rest of a WADI bean's lifecycle. My  
>>>>> understanding is that  XBean gives more control over bean  
>>>>> lifecycle, so I am hoping that  this is the way forward. Would  
>>>>> anyone like to comment ? Is anyone  following up the XBean  thread 
>>>>> and investigating the benefits and  costs of a Spring- >XBean 
>>>>> migration ?
>>>>>
>>>> I meant say: Is anyone interested in following up the XBean   
>>>> thread..... ?
>>>>
>>>> Jules
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> "Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
>>>> string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
>>>> crystallises out around it."
>>>>
>>>> /**********************************
>>>> * Jules Gosnell
>>>> * Partner
>>>> * Core Developers Network (Europe)
>>>> *
>>>> *    www.coredevelopers.net
>>>> *
>>>> * Open Source Training & Support.
>>>> **********************************/
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> "Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
>> string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
>> crystallises out around it."
>>
>> /**********************************
>> * Jules Gosnell
>> * Partner
>> * Core Developers Network (Europe)
>> *
>> *    www.coredevelopers.net
>> *
>> * Open Source Training & Support.
>> **********************************/
>>
>>


-- 
"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it."

/**********************************
 * Jules Gosnell
 * Partner
 * Core Developers Network (Europe)
 *
 *    www.coredevelopers.net
 *
 * Open Source Training & Support.
 **********************************/


Mime
View raw message