incubator-wadi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Goodwill <ja...@virtuas.com>
Subject Re: web site resources?
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:36:37 GMT
I am not a big fan of checking the site in, especially when it is a  
situation that every file in the repo will change on a new gen. I  
don't know if we would gain anything.




On Dec 23, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> I don't like the generated stuff going into SVN.  Its terribly easy to
> gen a site.
>
> Bill Dudney wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 23, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Geir,
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 23, 2005, at 7:16 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes, and you aren't going to like it :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your kidding right? I love pain :-)
>>>>
>>>>> What does the maven2 generated site look like now?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A broken version is currently on codehaus (wadi.codehaus.org).
>>>>
>>>>> I was just reading this list to propose an alternative, as simple
>>>>> xdoc oriented site that I've used successfully in geronimo,  
>>>>> harmony,
>>>>> jdo and agila lately.  Very simple.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The agila site looks fine. But we have burned a lot of cycles on
>>>> getting javadoc, clover, jxr, etc etc etc integrated into our maven
>>>> build. I'd hate for all that to go to waste.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fair enough.  So how does one add to and regen the maven2 site?
>>
>> 'mvn site' will regen the site 'mvn site:deploy' will push a new  
>> copy.
>>
>>>
>>>>> But if there's already a pile of maven generated cruft, why not.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed the output of maven is crufty, what alternative is there to
>>>> getting a whole site generated, with clover, javadoc etc?
>>>
>>> I can't find the clover stuff on the website.  are people  
>>> clamoring to
>>> have it there, or is it more useful for people when working lcoally?
>>>
>>> As for javadoc, I think that's a horrorshow to put in svn.  the WS
>>> project recently did that, resulting in hosing the poor ASf mail
>>> system as it tried to cope with what was effectively a 7G  
>>> mailbomb as
>>> generated by the svn diffs into email
>>>
>>
>> clover is not deployed yet but its at least as big as javadoc so I  
>> don't
>> want it in SVN. Good point thought that its probably better left as a
>> local only report.
>>
>> What does everyone else think?
>>
>>>>
>>>>> And yes, it's good to just check in the artifacts and do a svn  
>>>>> co on
>>>>> the webserver.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Check in the maven generated cruft? or the source xdoc documents  
>>>> and
>>>> generate then publish?
>>>>
>>>
>>> check in all generated crap you want on the site.  That makes it  
>>> easy
>>> for someone to check it out and look at it locally w/o having to
>>> figure out how to generate it.  At least for docs and such, this is
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>> my 0.02
>>
>> perhaps I'm misunderstanding - my initial question was 'do we have to
>> have our site in SVN'. Should I infer from this that we do have to  
>> put
>> our generated stuff into SVN?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bill Dudney
>>>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>>>> Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 23, 2005, at 8:12 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Geir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any input on this question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill Dudney
>>>>>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>> Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Bill Dudney <bdudney@apache.org>
>>>>>>> Date: December 21, 2005 1:34:06 PM MST
>>>>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: web site resources?
>>>>>>> Reply-To: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm working on getting the wadi website setup. I was  
>>>>>>> wondering how
>>>>>>> we should populate our site, here;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Project 
>>>>>>> +Website+Howto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it says that our site should be built from svn stored resources
>>>>>>> with a checkout (svn ... co) but out site is generated by  
>>>>>>> maven 2.
>>>>>>> I'm assuming that the idea is that we don't keep copies of  
>>>>>>> info on
>>>>>>> our site that will go stale. If that is the case this is it 

>>>>>>> OK to
>>>>>>> just publish our site from maven?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TTFN,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill Dudney
>>>>>>> MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>>> Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --Geir Magnusson Jr                                   
>>>>> +1-203-665-6437
>>>>> geirm@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
>>> geir@optonline.net
>>>
>>>
>


Mime
View raw message