Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D59ADB31 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67325 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2013 17:52:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 67196 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2013 17:52:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 67140 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2013 17:52:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:52:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF processing of domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:52:29 +0000 Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ezan1l0031ap0As565royi; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:51:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id f5rn1l00q1cCKD93i5rozj; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:51:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: Status From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:51:47 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <381127C7-EBAA-4F83-8329-6114612B02AE@jaguNET.com> References: To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1369245108; bh=3LWSVgXotVV73QcOnhHeLxRc6Zo1aydF+GkmJHLI19w=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=QNbGfGtg/QpBWVkMdGcyN4zsivnRtnk9tWJ8GleGBFRmwM3Lm7QUyWa7vW8L9Ikgm PkyfZBiqS63JmdBwm9kbAqzoowVZr6FxUSA0kgX23f3qGWLjmukgAA6uPNmghxQCXX e7fHbmJypcHlYCdkRGlwJLzKgNriny+BOxQ5EZxSX7M872sjul3mzKsMJq67U4qHjs SfBYlDxHNdFIU12zsdMi2NCZjxS6h7+7oK7NgfMron0jSDCgfdjB961rZllwY1N8gF aC/08xJfosMQSLAD0rHhLFS6nWw6So4MMTDN5tNk9hD3P8862k29rJCwfrN3W/yV1v OjcsbPTCjbtSw== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Anyone wish to add anything? Is the project dead and attic bound, or is it not? On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Stefan Teleman = wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jim Jagielski = wrote: >> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet >> lately and just pinging to see who's still watching >> and reading :) >=20 > This project is obviously dead. There is no active development being > done for C++2011, and no bug fixing for the existing C++2003 > implementation. >=20 > Fixing bugs in the current C++2003 implementation has proven > impossible. And that's all I am going to say on that particular > matter. >=20 > Starting work now on the C++2011 implementation is much too late: > there are already two open source production-quality implementations > available: GNU and libc++/Clang. libc++ is already a full and complete > implementation of C++2011. GNU will be complete in 2014. Both the GNU > and the Clang implementations have been in the works for at least 4 > years. >=20 > Yes, there's this mailing list with close to zero relevant activity. > Very easy to monitor and read: there's nothing to monitor, or read. >=20 > Sorry to be blunt and somewhat negative, but these are the fact as I = see them. >=20 > -- > Stefan Teleman > KDE e.V. > stefan.teleman@gmail.com >=20