Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5049016D.8000902@gmail.com>
References: <40394653-8FCC-4D04-A108-2C650AF8F95B@hates.ms>
	<5045E764.9090607@hates.ms>
	<CALdE9OC1foqvmgUXQ+Cvmt5yR=b7gfJpQcdtTxJAWp1_e8EtqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<595887D2-6E42-4BC4-AF69-085AE4BA8A7D@hates.ms>
	<CALdE9OBvZzgzMMqV5noQ0LANKBVi7=4UOK8_w43G00_PCD-7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5046BDC1.3020400@gmail.com>
	<CALdE9ODJeZdyVmvDucCfzneTxmV86_3w9FqC7rOe56-5zdM0Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<50476748.9040301@gmail.com>
	<CALdE9OD4RyJFq1Gci00G0ay1L80M-127Tuve9Nvx4NY5GtvKNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<50479CA6.8010306@hates.ms>
	<CALdE9OCx_OLwPhTJGKR7AYSA84ECHfiwru0n_kwUhfg_Sb3Qqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALdE9OC0cD6UOZ+DMK5D+51Z02tbt9gv4F8PTwL_zCeR9tn1sA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50481097.2080307@gmail.com>
	<CALdE9OCPSs6pcpMFZ+6rq6O+BXJJ+E-QEC1jDSoOb4xn2FiN=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<50481DDC.6010906@gmail.com>
	<5048A224.7060402@hates.ms>
	<CALdE9OCy=8awBwaE4cc1bGURx=DWX9HQBA4JF-kgY6a+9hEaAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5048CC76.5060603@gmail.com>
	<CALdE9OCO298AmkwWJcuMkMOG7kym9vqHYwnfh3pA2m5Jf_gqUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5049016D.8000902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:43:04 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALdE9OAXm7UsjR+O8TsAHUa6h1cxkiA-mq7YN5asg3Ci2mw4kA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]
From: Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman@gmail.com>
To: "Apache Standard C++ Library" <dev@stdcxx.apache.org>
Cc: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here's a thought: it's not pretty but how about having
> the function initialize the facet? It already has a pointer
> to the base class, so it could downcast it to std::numpunct
> (or moneypunct, respectively), and assign the initial values
> to the members. Would that work?

I haven't looked at them in detail (yet) but a cursory look shows that
they're both recursive for the successful case.

--Stefan

-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@gmail.com