Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <40394653-8FCC-4D04-A108-2C650AF8F95B@hates.ms>
References: <40394653-8FCC-4D04-A108-2C650AF8F95B@hates.ms>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 23:57:51 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALdE9OAN1H-jzGadddU4biEp-Bh2U1YAkPDZdsi9T=E5bKtirg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: STDCXX-1056 [was: Re: STDCXX forks]
From: Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman@gmail.com>
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:
>
> I tried, unsuccessfully, to reproduce the failure observed by Martin in 22.locale.moneypunct.mt, in both debug and optimized, wide and narrow builds on a 16x machine:
>

I can reproduce it consistently on Solaris without the patches. It has
a very high failure rate. It's also been reported at least once
before, here:

http://old.nabble.com/22.locale.numpunct.mt-run-hangs-td20133013.html

I remember there were more hits about 22.locale.numpunct.mt in Google
when I searched for it a while ago, but I didn't look as closely now.

I'll create a Solaris build without my patches tomorrow and send the output.

--Stefan

-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@gmail.com