From dev-return-8843-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org Fri Sep 28 22:41:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04E69DBCF for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19919 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 19881 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 19872 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2012 22:41:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:41:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.34.174.152] (HELO hates.ms) (64.34.174.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:41:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (cpe-107-015-035-019.nc.res.rr.com [107.15.35.19]) by hates.ms (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12E7A45C1AE for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5066277B.8060007@hates.ms> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:40:59 -0400 From: Liviu Nicoara User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX-1071 numpunct facet defect References: <506399E5.3050503@hates.ms> <50644977.3010503@hates.ms> <5064EEDA.2010004@gmail.com> <50658168.6000409@hates.ms> <53D52D02E87FA04A948D9A74A7AE617C12E8A1E9A4@Eagle.Blue.Roguewave.Com> In-Reply-To: <53D52D02E87FA04A948D9A74A7AE617C12E8A1E9A4@Eagle.Blue.Roguewave.Com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 9/28/12 11:01 AM, Travis Vitek wrote: > Only major versions can break binary. The versioning policy for stdcxx can be found here.. > > http://stdcxx.apache.org/versions.html I have renamed the binary-incompatible patch as patch-5.0.x.diff. Thanks, Liviu > > Travis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Liviu Nicoara [mailto:nikkoara@hates.ms] > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:52 AM > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX-1071 numpunct facet defect > > I thought I replied but I see no trace of my post: > > On 09/27/12 20:27, Martin Sebor wrote: >> On 09/27/2012 06:41 AM, Liviu Nicoara wrote: >>> On 09/26/12 20:12, Liviu Nicoara wrote: >>>> I have created STDCXX-1071 and linked to STDCXX-1056. [...] >>>> >>>> I am open to all questions, the more the better. Most of my opinions >>>> have been expressed earlier, but please ask if you want to know more. >>>> >>> >>> I am attaching here the proposed (4.3.x) patch and the timings results >>> (after re-verifying the correctness of the timing program and the >>> results). The 4.2.x patch, the 4.3.x patch, the test program and the >>> results file are also attached to the incident. >> >> The patch isn't binary compatible. We can't remove data members >> in a minor release. We could only do it in a major release. > > I posted two patches, one for 4.3.x and one for 4.2.x (the latter is binary compatible). My understanding was that minor version revisions may break binary compatibility. > > Liviu >