incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: A question (or two) of procedure, etc.
Date Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:15:28 GMT
Many projects have CTR on trunk and RTC (based on trunk revisions)
to branch. This works well.

On Sep 7, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:

> On 09/06/12 23:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> Every project has certain branch strategy, I'm not sure about this so
>>> maybe Martin can advice. I prefer to develop on trunk and cherry pick
>>> to the other branches avoiding bulk merges (and that's in both
>>> directions).
>> 
>> We've done most work on 4.2.x for historical reasons. I think
>> a better strategy is to develop, as you suggest, on trunk which
>> has the least restrictive commit policy, and merge changes out
>> to the more restrictive branches as appropriate.
> 
> If open to voting, I am for trunk first, branches later.
> 
> Liviu
> 


Mime
View raw message