Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-8530-apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive=stdcxx.apache.org@stdcxx.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C888DA82
	for <apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:18:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 32920 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 15:18:10 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32888 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 15:18:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@stdcxx.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.stdcxx.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32880 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2012 15:18:09 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:18:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.182] (HELO mail-vc0-f182.google.com)
 (209.85.220.182)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:18:03 +0000
Received: by vcbgb22 with SMTP id gb22so2178963vcb.41
        for <dev@stdcxx.apache.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=V/2yNwqNZmeQvxU8YpyAjmNvijFSxdiLXMqcgguPrx8=;
        b=g/m2VUi204Rhy1eXtZthGUk3jc37jFTZJuO78rjc7PRumFtC2Td9dPxaKw2JiB9VZu
         C6BCth5Q9kHj5eyAYim0/p0MSh1iPzNMEVp1jw+lmBrHhZFSPQhS8Gnsf8PaJzK+YQoH
         MdsrLo1T/olEHZXXesPgSMaEyKhpInCv22+Jn/3iB7Tp5hOEdYpJvTRxuwheatkF40TT
         zQeZ6HZbZPCRj9Djn/0JP9kUSb+bJH+lxPfOVhK2zm/VLbtSPuUW9zya9hWhmjm8Lec9
         7LJaMr/6XP93w70MhHG5z7DM4dHxJBFfVzqLjuq+YunVzca3TIs7SOvjFOSg7OzF8A8H
         4jkg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.155.203 with SMTP id t11mr3493947vcw.36.1346339862350;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.29.164 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <503F6E0B.2080009@hates.ms>
References: <503F6E0B.2080009@hates.ms>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:17:42 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALdE9OCSG6g=_nUrHm8v3O6HtjpdO98rQRHEmQs+cHvCUVBBng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New committers?
From: Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman@gmail.com>
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:
> I see in the February report (http://stdcxx.apache.org/status/2012-02.txt)
> that three new committers have been added to the project. Congratulations!
> Could one of you please update the stdcxx list of committers?

I don't mean to punt but I think Jim Jagielski maintains a separate
link with the correct list of committers:

<QUOTE>

An up-to-date list of all Apache committers (or committers-to-be) is
being maintained by Jim Jagielski on this page.

</QUOTE>

which links to:

http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html

But out of that comprehensive list of all the ASF Committers, I don't
know who the other two stdcxx Committers are.

Which also begs the question: why was this stdcxx Committers list
update done this way, by linking to a separate page, when the change
could have very well be made directly to the stdcxx's Committers list.

--Stefan

-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@gmail.com