Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50410695.70904@hates.ms>
References: <5040FAC8.9010500@hates.ms>
	<CALdE9OCk9Ven0OL7oM9Vg+Dt=BL5UxH3FhhBFH-mFYxnusyGfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50410695.70904@hates.ms>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:52:32 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALdE9OAUF9hWo9GFRxYbXeOB8Hv2vM8p9aoUMBj-sDkNY0Og0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Branching policy, 4.3.x, 5.0.0, etc.
From: Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman@gmail.com>
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikkoara@hates.ms> wrote:
> On 08/31/12 14:15, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>>
>>
>> My understanding is that 4.2.x and 4.3.x are bugfix/rfe releases while
>> 5.x would become C++2011.
>
>
> There is an implicitly stated binary incompatibility between 4.2 and 4.3.
> Are you privy to what prompted 4.3.x? I could look it up, I just didn't get
> that far.

Nope, don't know what prompted 4.3.x - Martin probably knows.

--Stefan

-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.teleman@gmail.com