incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: New committers?
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:43:39 GMT

On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@pathscale.com> wrote:

> On 09/ 1/12 01:35 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, "C. Bergström"
>> <cbergstrom@pathscale.com>  wrote:
>> 
>>> stdcxx ends up linking against *EVERY* C++ application if it's used in the
>>> default compiler setup.  (Which is what I was trying to achieve)  That
>>> includes *******GPLv2******** software in ports.  Get it?
>> How exactly is APLv2 different from 2-clause BSD or 3-clause BSD in
>> this respect? The BSD licenses are just as incompatible with GPLv2 as
>> APLv2 is.
> Our views may be the same, but others are not
> 
> from the apache website
> 
> "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible
with GPL version 2"
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
> 

FWIW, however, the ASF does not agree with that. That is pretty common
knowledge. So your view agrees with that of the ASF.
Mime
View raw message