incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "C. Bergström" <cbergst...@pathscale.com>
Subject Re: STDCXX "fork"
Date Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:18:52 GMT
  On 06/26/11 11:55 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> 2011/6/26 "C. Bergström"<cbergstrom@pathscale.com>:
>
>> The last time we checked the patches they caused some boost regressions so please
make sure to run the boost test suite.
> We don't run the Boost tests to validate the 2003 C++ Standard. We run
> the 2003 C++ Standard validation tests. If strict conformance to the
> 2003 C++ Standard causes problems with Boost, then that's a Boost
> problem and not a stdcxx problem.
>
> There were indeed numerous deviations from the 2003 C++ Standard in
> the original stdcxx implementation.

Do any of your patches fix these and if so which one(s)?  Do you have 
reduced test cases or which test suite?

Mime
View raw message