Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tropikhajma@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=HlDy/SuHcpuPbjuBE4UxpiUour5h3SrP1VexejvaNzZZJVmjydSJAmlkl5+HD0pa+4
         Tkc6JnWz9AiniWYofTxMiAcy33F4KaYAA6USTyelwl2o1Wx+6wKw0t81bGSo62X+5Yxi
         /RzBVtHdvBP1KOcaVe45GOvcTHKgoEXfVJ/oo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:40:48 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimN6o9ob-Cv1dXg5cfYOd-3FGL0q6Rn8wMTo7Oy@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: stdcxx, Solaris, KDE
From: "Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma" <tropikhajma@gmail.com>
To: stdcxx-dev@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,
I'm one of the guys porting KDE to Solaris and we use stdcxx extensively there.
I just spent some time rediscovering an old stdcxx bug, which led me
to the stdcxx site in search for any news about the project.
I found KDE or Solaris mentioned in
http://stdcxx.apache.org/status/2010-05.text
http://stdcxx.apache.org/status/2010-09.txt

I don't think I have the skills to actually make any non-trivial
changes to the project, but I'd like to help keep stdcxx alive and see
a bug fix release at least (although we've seen very few stdcxx issues
so far).
I've read in one of the statuses that you lack build&test infrastructure,
please do let me know if there's a way to help, I know a machine (or
two) that might be used, running Solaris 11 or OpenIndiana (the
Solaris fork).

best

P.

P.S. although I am an Oracle employee, this has nothing to do with my
work at Oracle, etc. (the usual disclaimer :-)