Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87869 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2010 02:13:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jun 2010 02:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 28034 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2010 02:13:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 28007 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2010 02:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 27999 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2010 02:13:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 02:13:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stefan.teleman@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.54] (HELO mail-vw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.212.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 02:13:39 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so1942751vws.41 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oc5n/DMO2/XmwdTj0mJMnGJ6Wq+yzHwrQ0JdWeGk5WA=; b=VD1NT3lSlaMFdlwaoCsceIpF0p4tAQEA2m8tAs8DdahgXDClk813cL72ljq5p0oiga 4tu7cSJ+dRIW8wp3KMWTRkB4dcfS3aNYpYEtGOpxxbFO7huob6g8Kh1Irxd/YucFvKg7 neyyrgS8lpcBYDk7UGW3fyyxHdQQGaoLZupeI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CfleYRPZq75awXOvry8wGH6fFVNZ/oORcc7o+fMEb3MO6hVwLVKu0rAPJS69yirEKd Ea4ougl6AHVBbUwL0NLT1aw4D37Haw+MuCoO8tCCqekHyis75jVhEGoGeOG11zToYlQW RLxtj3VrAfpfgAN1emYDc/SFG2evvrJQnGS0M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.18.163 with SMTP id w35mr6357797qaa.70.1275703998463; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.26.209 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 19:13:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C09B192.7000101@pathscale.com> References: <4C02A712.9010102@pathscale.com> <4C04081B.4090506@gmail.com> <4C042A47.1000300@pathscale.com> <4C0442DC.2050201@gmail.com> <4C096D71.8020806@pathscale.com> <4C09B192.7000101@pathscale.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:13:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: C++0x support? From: Stefan Teleman To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?C=2E_Bergstr=C3=B6m?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/6/4 "C. Bergstr=C3=B6m" : > Hi Stefan, > > Does that mean the suncc team will be helping to improve it? =C2=A0If nei= ther > please don't hijack threads. =C2=A0I removed maybe too much context from = the > email, but it was in reference to C++0x + OpenSolaris. You should ask the compiler team directly what their plans are. I cannot speak for them. My email was in response to your statement about supporting C++0X in OpenSolaris with the Sun C++ compiler (which you have restated in this message). I wonder how you plan on supporting C++0X in OpenSolaris with the Sun C++ compiler, when this compiler does not currently support *any* C++0X features, and support for these features will not be available for quite some time. And the compiler is not open source. So no, I am not hijacking threads. I am seeking some clarification with respect to your own statements. --Stefan --=20 Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.teleman@gmail.com