incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:16:43 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Lemings 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:14 PM
> To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: 
> include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple 
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp 
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp 
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:10 AM
> > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: 
> > include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple 
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp 
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp 
> > tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp
> > 
> ...
> > > This can probably be changed to use a void return type, which will
> > > simplify the code further. You only really need the return 
> > type to chain
> > > assignments or to call a function on the result, none of 
> > which we should
> > > be doing.
> > 
> > Good idea! Also, the inline specifier is redundant and should
> > be removed.
> 
> A void return type causes an compile error:

Duh.  Disregard.

Mime
View raw message