incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] naming convention for variadic template arguments (was: Re: svn commit: r668318 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h include/rw/_tuple_traits.h include/tuple tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp)
Date Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:23:26 GMT
 
This mean you're quiting SourcePro/Rogue Wave but and starting
work on STDCXX now that know one can tell you otherwise?  :P

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liviu Nicoara [mailto:Liviu.Nicoara@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org; dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] naming convention for variadic template 
> arguments (was: Re: svn commit: r668318 - in 
> /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h 
> include/rw/_tuple_traits.h include/tuple 
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor on behalf of Martin Sebor
> > Sent: Fri 6/27/2008 3:05 PM
> > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] naming convention for variadic template 
> arguments (was: Re: svn commit: r668318 - in 
> /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: include/rw/_tuple.h 
> include/rw/_tuple_traits.h include/tuple 
> tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp)
> >  
> > This thread kind of fizzled out so let me resurrect it and reiterate
> > the proposed naming convention to follow unless more specific names
> > are appropriate:
> > 
> >      template <class _TypeT, class... _Types>     # 1
> > 
> > [...]
> > Check the box below to vote:
> > 
> 
>   [x] In favor (of #1)
>   [ ] Opposed (suggest an improvement and rationale)
> 
> -L
> 

Mime
View raw message