incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x regular expressions
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:24:24 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:55 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> regular expressions
> 
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM
> >> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> >> regular expressions
> >>
> >> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Eric Lemings 
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM
> >>>> To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org'
> >>>> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> >>>> regular expressions
> >>>>
> >>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM
> >>>>> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> >>>>> regular expressions
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>>>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them?
> >>>>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these
> >>>>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem
> >>>>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need
> >>>>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be
> >>>>> changed?
> >>>> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved.  I tried.
> >>> Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues.  Some of
> >>> these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks
> >>> of work.
> >> As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would
> >> be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to
> >> make, and wait for feedback before making them. Especially
> >> deleting issues should be brought up because doing so not only
> >> permanently removes them from the database but also breaks any
> >> links pointing to such issues.
> > 
> > Jira is pretty smart.  It allows you to relink such issues before
> > deleting issues so there are no broken links.
> 
> This is now a broken link:
>    http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-33
> 
> > 
> > And the issues are still in the database.  I just moved them from
> > subtasks into individual issues.  Or you'd prefer to keep the
> > duplicate issues?
> 
> I would prefer us to have a plan before we start moving issues
> around or permanently deleting them.
> 
> As it is, the rest of us are left to guess what's happening
> with the existing issues, why they're being deleted, why new
> ones are being created, or where you plan to stop. If you want
> to change/improve things you need to let us in on your plan
> ahead of time to make sure your changes don't adversely affect
> anyone or that there isn't a better way to go about implementing
> them. It's possible that we'd end up doing exactly what you did
> in the end. The big difference is that we'd all understand and
> (hopefully) agree with what's going on.

Initiative...momentum got the better of me I suppose.  :)  Sorry.

So what is it, in particular, that we all do NOT understand or agree
with?  I'll clarify if I can... or haven't already.

Brad.

Mime
View raw message