incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Lemings" <Eric.Lemi...@roguewave.com>
Subject RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x regular expressions
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:37:50 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Lemings [mailto:Eric.Lemings@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> regular expressions
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM
> > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> > regular expressions
> > 
> > Eric Lemings wrote:
> > >  
> > > 
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Eric Lemings 
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM
> > >> To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org'
> > >> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> > >> regular expressions
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM
> > >>> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> > >>> regular expressions
> > >>>
> > >>> Martin Sebor wrote:
> > >>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them?
> > >>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these
> > >>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem
> > >>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need
> > >>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be
> > >>> changed?
> > >> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved.  I tried.
> > > 
> > > Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues.  Some of
> > > these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks
> > > of work.
> > 
> > As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would
> > be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to
> > make, and wait for feedback before making them. Especially
> > deleting issues should be brought up because doing so not only
> > permanently removes them from the database but also breaks any
> > links pointing to such issues.
> 
> Jira is pretty smart.  It allows you to relink such issues before
> deleting issues so there are no broken links.
> 
> And the issues are still in the database.  I just moved them from
> subtasks into individual issues.  Or you'd prefer to keep the
> duplicate issues?

Of course, if there were any data at all attached to these subtasks
I would have left them and made a clone as Travis did but AFAICT there
is nothing at all really in these issues which is why I deleted them.

Brad.

Mime
View raw message