Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54273 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2008 22:19:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2008 22:19:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 53963 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2008 22:19:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 53942 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2008 22:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 53927 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2008 22:19:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:19:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:19:07 +0000 Received: from exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com (exchmail01.blue.roguewave.com [10.22.129.22]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m3LMJIKO019984 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:19:19 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: tags/4.2.1-rc-2 results Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:19:02 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: tags/4.2.1-rc-2 results Thread-Index: Acij/WMrNkcm+Xu2RdW3KyxUtOSJ+gAABtNg References: <480C177B.8060705@roguewave.com> <480D1208.9070404@roguewave.com> From: "Travis Vitek" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =20 >Martin Sebor wrote: > >Travis Vitek wrote: >> =20 >>=20 >> I've noticed that there are some significant differences between the >> X-Platform results for -rc-1 and trunk.=20 >>=20 >> It appears that the cause is that all of the -rc-1 build=20 >> results in the X-Platform view page are from old source. > >Unless I'm missing something that should be okay. -rc-1 corresponds >to old sources (before last week's merge). -rc-2 is right after the >merge (I still need to tag the branch). > Ah. I was under the impression that -rc-1 was immediately after the merge and I had just missed the notification. Sorry about that.