Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83634 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2008 19:58:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2008 19:58:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 26149 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2008 19:58:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-stdcxx-dev-archive@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 26131 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2008 19:58:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@stdcxx.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@stdcxx.apache.org Received: (qmail 26122 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2008 19:58:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:58:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.roguewave.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:57:17 +0000 Received: from nebula.bco.roguewave.com ([10.70.3.27]) by moroha.roguewave.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m3LJvZLY015425 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:57:36 GMT Message-ID: <480CF1B0.7020502@roguewave.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:57:36 -0600 From: Martin Sebor Organization: Rogue Wave Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org Subject: ABI test results with gcc 3.4.3/Red Hat EL 4.4/12D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here's a list of all failing tests with 4.2.0 and 4.2.1, with backward and forward binary compatibility runs included in the second and third columns. Cells with n/a indicate that the test wasn't available in 4.2.0. Cells with A### indicate the number of failing assertions. The failures in 21.string.replace, 22.locale.numpunct.mt, and 22.locale.messages are possible sources of concern. The COMP failure in 26.valarray.cassign is a known problem that I plan to fix by deleting the test from 4.2.1. gcc 3.4.3/RHEL 4.4/12D SRC: 4.2.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.1 LIB: 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.2.0 4.2.1 18.numeric.special.float n/a n/a A3 A3 18.numeric.special.int n/a n/a A13 A13 21.cwchar A10 A10 A5 A5 21.string.append A560 A560 0 0 21.string.assign A360 A360 A60 A60 21.string.insert A840 A840 A180 A180 21.string.io.stdcxx-250 n/a n/a ABRT 0 21.string.replace A1060 A1140 A240 A240 21.string.stdcxx-162 ABRT ABRT ABRT ABRT 21.string.stdcxx-231 n/a n/a ABRT 0 22.locale.codecvt.stdcxx-435 n/a n/a ABRT 0 22.locale.messages 0 0 HUP 0 22.locale.ctype A1101 A1101 0 0 22.locale.ctype.is A4 0 0 0 22.locale.ctype.narrow A1091 A1091 0 0 22.locale.ctype.scan A2 A2 0 0 22.locale.ctype.tolower A2 A2 0 0 22.locale.ctype.toupper A2 A2 0 0 22.locale.money.get A16 A16 A16 A16 22.locale.num.get A96 A96 A96 A96 22.locale.num.put A28 A28 A26 A4 22.locale.num.put.stdcxx-2 n/a n/a ABRT 0 22.locale.numpunct.mt HUP SEGV HUP HUP 22.locale.time.get A46 A46 A46 A46 23.deque.special A1536 A1536 0 0 23.vector.bool.stdcxx-235 ABRT ABRT 0 0 25.random.shuffle A1 A1 0 0 26.class.gslice A162 A162 A162 A162 26.valarray.cassign 0 0 COMP COMP 27.basic.ios.copyfmt.stdcxx-766 n/a n/a ABRT 0 27.filebuf.members.stdcxx-308 n/a n/a ABRT 0 27.ostream.unformatted.stdcxx-626 n/a n/a ABRT 0 27.stringbuf.overflow.stdcxx-795 n/a n/a ABRT 0