Martin Sebor wrote:
> Thanks for fixing it, Travis. I can't help but be a little worried
> about the other "little problem on Windows" that Farid said he'd
> found in STDCXX-426 and fixed by changing the "r" to "rb" I guess
> we'll see tomorrow...

Windows is not looking good. With Farid's patch reverted locales
seem to be processed correctly but all examples and tests are
failing with an ERROR. Andrew, I'd appreciate if you'd look into
it ASAP and either fix the problem or revert your patch.

Martin

> 
> Martin
> 
> Travis Vitek wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Andrew Black wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings Martin.
>>>
>>> I haven't looked with a debugger, but my suspicion is that the new difs
>>> are caused by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev .  I
>>> retrieved the results from a random build (34606522 - icl 10, Windows
>>> XP, 12d, 4/1, r643226), and the failures are not observed.  This
>>> particular build occurred after
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643120&view=rev was checked in (my
>>> resolution for STDCXX-426), but before Farid's change (
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev ) was checked in.
>>>
>>> --Andrew Black
>>
>> Thanks Andrew. That looks like the problem. After spending over an hour
>> wading through the windows build infrastructure, I finally got enough of
>> an idea of what was going on so that I could test the change...
>>
>> The following command line
>>
>>     ..\bin\exec -d c:\build\stdcxx\trunk\examples spell.exe radix.exe
>> tele.exe
>>
>> Produces this output with Farid's change,
>>
>>     NAME         STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT    USER     SYS
>> REAL
>>     spell.exe      DIFF    0                         0.015   0.000
>> 0.000
>>     radix.exe      DIFF    0                         0.015   0.015
>> 0.000
>>     tele.exe       DIFF    0                         0.015   0.000
>> 0.000
>>
>> And produces this after removing it and rebuilding the exec utility.
>>
>>     NAME         STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT    USER     SYS
>> REAL
>>     spell.exe         0    0                         0.015   0.000
>> 0.000
>>     radix.exe         0    0                         0.015   0.000
>> 0.000
>>     tele.exe          0    0                         0.015   0.000
>> 0.000
>>
>> I'll be committing a fix in a few seconds.
>>
>> Travis
>>
>>> Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>> Looks like all examples are being reported in the DIFF status
>>>> in all recent Windows builds, including a few from this morning.
>>>> I suspect it might have something to do with Andrew's recent
>>>> patch to the exec utility. Andrew, or someone with access to
>>>> a Windows machine, can you please look into this? It would
>>>> be good to get this resolved before the weekend.
>>>>
>>>>   http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Martin
>