incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: NEW_OFLOW_SAFE config test
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:24:50 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:46 AM
> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: NEW_OFLOW_SAFE config test
> 
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >  
> > Here's an error compiling the NEW_OFLOW_SAFE.cpp config test:
> > 
> > aCC -mt -I. -AA   +w +W392 +W655 +W684 +W818 +W819 +W849 
> +W2193 +W2236
> > +W2261 +W2340 +W240
> > 1 +W2487 +W4227 +W4229 +W4231 +W4235 +W4237 +W4249 +W4255 +W4272 
> > +W4284
> > +W4285 +W4286 +W42
> > 96 +W4297 +W3348  -c
> > 
> /amd/devco/lemings/work/stdcxx/trunk.gofish/etc/config/src/NEW_OFLOW_
> > SAFE.cpp -o NEW_OFLOW_SAFE.o
> > 
> "/amd/devco/lemings/work/stdcxx/trunk.gofish/etc/config/src/NEW_OFLOW_
> > SA
> > FE.cpp", line 46:
> > error #2020: identifier "size_t" is undefined
> >           void* p = ::operator new (size_t (-1));
> >                                     ^
> >  
> > Shouldn't 'size_t' be replaced with '_RWSTD_SIZE_T'?  Or one of the 
> > standard headers should be included (e.g. <stddef.h>, <cstddef>)?
> 
> The latter. This regression was introduced here:
>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=634731

  Hmm. The NEW_THROWS.cpp before this change also used size_t without
including the stddef.h:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/src/NEW_THROWS.cpp?
revision=611451&view=markup&pathrev=634731

Farid.

Mime
View raw message