incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: NEW_OFLOW_SAFE config test
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:46:17 GMT
Eric Lemings wrote:
>  
> Here's an error compiling the NEW_OFLOW_SAFE.cpp config test:
> 
> aCC -mt -I. -AA   +w +W392 +W655 +W684 +W818 +W819 +W849 +W2193 +W2236
> +W2261 +W2340 +W240
> 1 +W2487 +W4227 +W4229 +W4231 +W4235 +W4237 +W4249 +W4255 +W4272 +W4284
> +W4285 +W4286 +W42
> 96 +W4297 +W3348  -c
> /amd/devco/lemings/work/stdcxx/trunk.gofish/etc/config/src/NEW_OFLOW_
> SAFE.cpp -o NEW_OFLOW_SAFE.o
> "/amd/devco/lemings/work/stdcxx/trunk.gofish/etc/config/src/NEW_OFLOW_SA
> FE.cpp", line 46:
> error #2020: identifier "size_t" is undefined
>           void* p = ::operator new (size_t (-1));
>                                     ^
>  
> Shouldn't 'size_t' be replaced with '_RWSTD_SIZE_T'?  Or one of
> the standard headers should be included (e.g. <stddef.h>,
> <cstddef>)?

The latter. This regression was introduced here:
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=634731

Good catch! We should add a test checking the expected result of this
(and other config macros) on known platforms.

Martin

Mime
View raw message