incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: [RFC] build result views
Date Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:37:51 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:msebor@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 6:18 AM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RFC] build result views
> 
> I'm looking for feedback on the two sets of nightly result 
> pages we currently publish:
> 
>    http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
> 
> and
> 
>    http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/builds
> 
> Specifically, I'm wondering what would people think about 
> replacing the first page with the second, or something like 
> it. Do you find yourself using the first page more or do you 
> prefer the second one, and why?

  The first page is useful to see the overall status of the library.
I'm using it just for sure that Windows builds are green :)

  Of cource the second page is more convinient to see what
examples or tests are failed and how these fails dependent
from the build type.

  I would like to have the possibility to merge the results of the
multiple platforms into the one page, i.e.:
- all windows builds (MSVC and ICC);
- all MSVC builds;
- all ICC/windows builds;
- all ICC builds (windows and linux);
- all MSVC 8.0 build + all gcc 4.2.0 builds;
...

  It might be realized as the current page
(http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/builds)
but with the checkboxes on the each line of the table and button
"Next" somewhere on the page.

> If neither, how do you 
> analyze build results and why do you find your system 
> preferable to what we have? What does your ideal result page 
> look like? What data should it show and how should it be presented?

Farid.

Mime
View raw message