Return-Path: 
 <stdcxx-dev-return-5744-apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14780 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2007 19:25:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2007 19:25:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 32811 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2007 19:25:19 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32799 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2007 19:25:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stdcxx-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32788 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2007 19:25:19 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:25:19 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:25:23 +0000
Received: from qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com (qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com
 [192.168.170.59])
	by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9MJOx8f009185
	for <stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:24:59 GMT
Received: from [10.70.3.143] ([10.70.3.143]) by qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com with
 Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
	 Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:24:21 -0600
Message-ID: <471CF90E.2070806@roguewave.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:25:02 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build tag really optional?
References: 
 <CFFDD219128FD94FB4F92B99F52D0A49A7DA4E@exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com>
 <CFFDD219128FD94FB4F92B99F52D0A499AA704@exchmail01.Blue.Roguewave.Com>
 <7BDB2168BEAEF14C98F1901FD2DE64380117EF6C@epmsa009.minsk.epam.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <7BDB2168BEAEF14C98F1901FD2DE64380117EF6C@epmsa009.minsk.epam.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2007 19:24:21.0883 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[260FDCB0:01C814E1]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Travis Vitek [mailto:Travis.Vitek@roguewave.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 7:37 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Build tag really optional?
>>
>>
>> Eric Lemings wrote:
>>>
>>> On line 570, the README file in RC6 says the following:
>>>
>>> "                  The <build-types>  argument  is optional. 
>>  When  not
>>>                  specified a build type of 11s is assumed."
>>>
>>> I tried that but it doesn't appear to build anything.
>> Just FYI, this quote is from the 'VisualStudio Setup Instructions'
>> section. Yes, you are correct, if you don't specify the 
>> option, you don't get a build.
>>
>> It should be a pretty simple fix. I'll file a bug and add a 
>> quick patch to use a default value of 11s as advertised.
> 
>   Travis, I'm just fixed it
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=587201&view=rev), sorry.
> 
>   I've commited the fix in branches/4.2.x, but maybe it should be in
> 4.2.0 for
> consistency with README file?

No. I'd like 4.2.0 to stay as a snapshot of the release. 4.2.x
will evolve as we make changes after the 4.2.0 release (i.e.,
it'll become 4.2.1, 4.2.2, etc.)

Martin