Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68595 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2007 16:51:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2007 16:51:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 20376 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2007 16:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20363 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2007 16:50:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20351 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2007 16:50:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:50:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:50:58 +0000 Received: from [10.70.3.58] ([10.70.3.58]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l94Gm9KL020066 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:48:10 GMT Message-ID: <4705195E.9030708@roguewave.com> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:48:30 -0600 From: Andrew Black User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx acknowledgments References: <20747881.1191356510823.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <4702ADFA.70609@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <4702ADFA.70609@roguewave.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Greetings all. One thought that I have looking over the proposed patch is that it doesn't include the names of people who have contribute code to the release, but who aren't comitters. Scott Zhong and Travis Vitek both have changes attributed to them, but neither name appears in the list. I suspect there are others, but it would require a search through the change logs to locate the changes in question. --Andrew Black Martin Sebor wrote: > In the patch attached to the issue Marc proposes to replace > the names of the original Rogue Wave "contributors" to the > project (which included support engineers as well management) > with those of stdcxx committers (including Emeriti). I'd like > to request people's opinion on this change. I personally am > not entirely comfortable dropping all the contributors that > predate stdcxx, although perhaps it may not be inappropriate > (sorry for the double negative) to pare it down to people who > contributed significant code and/or documentation changes). > > What do others think? > > Martin > > Marc Betz (JIRA) wrote: >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >> Marc Betz updated STDCXX-505: >> ----------------------------- >> >> Attachment: (was: acknow.html) >> >>> Update the Acknowledgments page >>> ------------------------------- >>> >>> Key: STDCXX-505 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-505 >>> Project: C++ Standard Library >>> Issue Type: Sub-task >>> Components: Documentation >>> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4 >>> Reporter: Marc Betz >>> Assignee: Marc Betz >>> Fix For: 4.2 >>> >>> >> >> >