From stdcxx-dev-return-5325-apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Oct 02 22:04:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45357 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2007 22:04:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2007 22:04:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 35433 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 22:04:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35419 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 22:04:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35394 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2007 22:04:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:04:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msebor@gmail.com designates 209.85.162.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.162.178] (HELO el-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.162.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:04:14 +0000 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j27so2771445elf for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=6ozE5UqYY77d8AfjvMP79E/g3+49NmyMg3JGJ8wZxDM=; b=uenl+w2My2wVhUfkvEF9BKZUFgeLpd8bPNhCfpGjYg3LLh2v3xuzqd3WuI1WTK+irkCuANnnzx/xiVkU1UxR4y0PSR+XgZa1Hn/pdetmCzDKWwE7hhN6aP81vszHrnkG9lBoC9u5MBA93I51tZBgNmMvNttksRbQdI5yHkL5I/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=sIuH6h3c9hbZr9tormwPDWfbRFeZCZ4cpjJJa6EbEv5ZNWGcBpQ79etRk3eOzHeiCyahJpsdu+49KjNP3FZ8nclA9tlj90s4Qb9vGgLx49V2JmITLJ3heUU7UtsakbwBb8thyymrkoauWsu+UfFTPmiA6brwJ9m906oVTbjrNVo= Received: by 10.143.162.8 with SMTP id p8mr202750wfo.1191362632379; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.19.230.97? ( [67.53.46.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b5sm15335378rva.2007.10.02.15.03.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4702BFAF.8040908@roguewave.com> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:01:19 -1000 From: Martin Sebor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx acknowledgments References: <20747881.1191356510823.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <4702ADFA.70609@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <4702ADFA.70609@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Martin Sebor X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Martin Sebor wrote: > In the patch attached to the issue Marc proposes to replace > the names of the original Rogue Wave "contributors" to the > project (which included support engineers as well management) > with those of stdcxx committers (including Emeriti). I'd like > to request people's opinion on this change. I personally am > not entirely comfortable dropping all the contributors that > predate stdcxx, although perhaps it may not be inappropriate > (sorry for the double negative) to pare it down to people who > contributed significant code and/or documentation changes). I should also add that, at the same time, I'm not sure it would be completely fair to acknowledge stdcxx committers who have never committed any code, created issues, or participated on the lists. Also, looking at Marc's patch more closely, I don't see either of our Mentors listed. It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project where we could retain any or all the names from the current acknowledgment page without having to tackle the delicate issue of who from the stdcxx community deserves to be mentioned. Opinions please? Note that this issue needs to be resolved for 4.2.0. Martin > > What do others think? > > Martin > > Marc Betz (JIRA) wrote: >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >> Marc Betz updated STDCXX-505: >> ----------------------------- >> >> Attachment: (was: acknow.html) >> >>> Update the Acknowledgments page >>> ------------------------------- >>> >>> Key: STDCXX-505 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-505 >>> Project: C++ Standard Library >>> Issue Type: Sub-task >>> Components: Documentation >>> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4 >>> Reporter: Marc Betz >>> Assignee: Marc Betz >>> Fix For: 4.2 >>> >>> >> >> > >