incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r587873 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.mt.cpp
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:12:19 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 5:45 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r587873 - 
> /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/tests/utilities/20.temp.buffer.mt.cpp
> 
> faridz@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: faridz
> > Date: Wed Oct 24 05:22:17 2007
> > New Revision: 587873
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=587873&view=rev
> [...]
> > @@ -137,10 +138,10 @@
> >  
> >  #endif   // _RWSTD_INT64_T
> >  
> > -    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT8_T*,  std::ptrdiff_t> buf0;
> > -    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT16_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf1;
> > -    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT32_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf2;
> > -    std::pair<Type64*,         std::ptrdiff_t> buf3;
> > +    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT8_T*,  std::ptrdiff_t> buf0 (0, 0);
> > +    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT16_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf1 (0, 0);
> > +    std::pair<_RWSTD_INT32_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf2 (0, 0);
> > +    std::pair<Type64*,         std::ptrdiff_t> buf3 (0, 0);
> 
> Why is this necessary? Shouldn't the default ctor zero out 
> (i.e., default-initialize) its members?
> Is this is a workaround for a compiler bug? (If so, which one?)

  I think it was "just for sure".

  Reverted back thus:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=587909

Farid.

Mime
View raw message