incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: Build tag really optional?
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:25:02 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Travis Vitek [mailto:Travis.Vitek@roguewave.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 7:37 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Build tag really optional?
>>
>>
>> Eric Lemings wrote:
>>>
>>> On line 570, the README file in RC6 says the following:
>>>
>>> "                  The <build-types>  argument  is optional. 
>>  When  not
>>>                  specified a build type of 11s is assumed."
>>>
>>> I tried that but it doesn't appear to build anything.
>> Just FYI, this quote is from the 'VisualStudio Setup Instructions'
>> section. Yes, you are correct, if you don't specify the 
>> option, you don't get a build.
>>
>> It should be a pretty simple fix. I'll file a bug and add a 
>> quick patch to use a default value of 11s as advertised.
> 
>   Travis, I'm just fixed it
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=587201&view=rev), sorry.
> 
>   I've commited the fix in branches/4.2.x, but maybe it should be in
> 4.2.0 for
> consistency with README file?

No. I'd like 4.2.0 to stay as a snapshot of the release. 4.2.x
will evolve as we make changes after the 4.2.0 release (i.e.,
it'll become 4.2.1, 4.2.2, etc.)

Martin


Mime
View raw message