incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <>
Subject RE: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]
Date Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:33:18 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [] 
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 8:23 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: STDCXX tests fails and reasons [MSVC]
> >> Jira for the "bug in rw_match(&char, &char, 1)."
> But is that really a bug in rw_match()? It looks to me 
> more like a design limitation than a bug. In the case of the
> wchar_t* and UserChar* overloads of rw_match() there should 
> be a simple solution: make sure the first (char*) argument 
> has enough elements (it should be easy to guarantee that 
> since the argument is the hardcoded string we match against). 
> And changing the char* overload to behave the same as the 
> other two, i.e., to only do the expansion on the first 
> argument and not on the second should fix that case, no?

  The problem is in that rw_match() used to compare single characters.
There no problem in compare one character NUL-terminated string
(i.e. "b" or "a@0b"). We should not use rw_match() to compare
single characters.


View raw message