incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Black (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Closed: (STDCXX-116) [Mac OS X 10.2.8] Examples fail to build due to LD error
Date Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:51:05 GMT


Andrew Black closed STDCXX-116.

    Resolution: Won't Fix

Testing with Darwin 8.10.1 (Mac OS X 10.4.10) and GCC 4.2.0 fails to reproduce this issue.

Given that this issue was reported with an antiquated version of the operating system and
compiler in question, I am closing this issue as 'Won't Fix'.

> [Mac OS X 10.2.8] Examples fail to build due to LD error
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: STDCXX-116
>                 URL:
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build
>         Environment: Mac OS X 10.2.8/Darwin 6.8 with GCC 3.1
>            Reporter: Andrew Black
>            Assignee: Andrew Black
> When attempting to build the examples as part of the make sequence, I recieve the following
> gcc -c -I/Volumes/Orion/Work/stdcxx/include/ansi   -D_RWSTD_USE_CONFIG -I/Users/blackaw/Documents/Work/stdcxx//include
-I/Volumes/Orion/Work/stdcxx/include -I/Volumes/Orion/Work/stdcxx/examples/include  -pedantic
-nostdinc++  -W -Wall -Wcast-qual -Winline -Wshadow -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -Wcast-align
> gcc accum.o -o accum  -L/Users/blackaw/Documents/Work/stdcxx//lib -lstd  -lsupc++ -lm
> ld: archive: /Users/blackaw/Documents/Work/stdcxx//lib/libstd.a has no table of contents,
add one with ranlib(1) (can't load from it)
> make[2]: *** [accum] Error 1
> make[1]: [examples] Error 2 (ignored)
> The obvious solution is to call ranlib as part of the make process for the library, but
this would involve altering the make proccess for the config tests, library and test library,
along with requiring conditional logic to protect other platforms/compilers from this step
that would likely cause problems.
> Looking at the man page for ranlib on my linux box here, it appears that a better solution
could be to define ARFLAGS for gcc as being '-s', though I could potentially see problems
emerging were this to be an unconditional definition.
> I will try this solution tonight.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message