Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54398 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2007 21:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 94878 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2007 21:07:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94867 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2007 21:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94856 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2007 21:07:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:07:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:07:17 -0700 Received: from [10.70.3.58] ([10.70.3.58]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5IL6DNa014745 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:06:14 GMT Message-ID: <4676F3EF.4090407@roguewave.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:06:55 -0600 From: Andrew Black User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Windows build error(s) References: <46741362.1080706@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <46741362.1080706@roguewave.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Greetings Martin. I believe the cause of the observed behavior with result ordering is due to the interleaving of the results from the two database servers. The results from the databases come sorted in a case-insensitive manner, but the exporter script uses a case-sensitive sort. Resolving this should be a fairly simple task. --Andrew Black Martin Sebor wrote: > Looks like we're having some problems in Intel C++ builds on Windows > (see the error below). Farid, do you know about this? > > Also, for some reason some Windows build results appear before those > for Tru64, and some after. I thought the rows were being sorted by > the name of the OS? Andrew, can you please look into it? > > Thanks > Martin > > ### Building solution / Creating HTML log > Solution build script > Checking arguments... > Loading solution... > D:\bman5\builds\33687223\source-buildspace\etc\config\windows\build.wsf(226, > 10) (null): Call was rejected by callee.