Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <464B6A98.2050708@roguewave.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:33:28 -0600
From: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Organization: Rogue Wave Software
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions raised by May report
References: <464B5C57.7060807@rowe-clan.net> <464B5D84.9010503@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <464B5D84.9010503@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> * I'm qurious about http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/#committers.
>>   Why some people are following CTR and others RTC?
>>
>> quoting that page
>> "Stdcxx Committers are Developers with commit (or write) access to the stdcxx
>> codebase. Except where noted, all stdcxx committers follow the
>> Review-Then-Commit policy. The list of current committers in alphabetical order
>> is below:"
>>
>> I think this is a misunderstanding, but perhaps worse.  The statement is that
>> except where there is C-T-R code bases, svn operates under R-T-C.  I don't
>> believe this was ment to apply to individuals, please correct me if I'm wrong.

We're discussing this as we speak (the commit policy comments
in the table are out of date). See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/200705.mbox/%3c4649D202.6020709@roguewave.com%3e

Martin