incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit policy
Date Tue, 22 May 2007 14:15:18 GMT
[+1]  All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
       Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
       constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
       by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
       involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
       or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
       on some platforms.
 
[-1]  All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes
       with no exceptions.
 
 [0]  New committers and committers who haven't been active in
       more than [6] months follow the RTC policy for at least
       [4] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR.
 
Farid.

Mime
View raw message