incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Farid Zaripov" <Farid_Zari...@epam.com>
Subject RE: [RFC] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit
Date Tue, 15 May 2007 16:21:27 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:30 PM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RFC] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit
> 

[...]

> So I would like to propose that we all follow a relaxed form 
> of the Review-Then-Commit policy, where "simple" or "obviously safe"
> changes be allowed to go in under the Commit-Then-Review process.
> I don't think it's necessary to precisely define what "simple"
> or "obviously safe" means. It's a judgment call.
> 
> Does this sound reasonable to everyone? Are we ready to have 
> a vote on this proposal?

  I'm agree and ready to vote.

Farid.

Mime
View raw message