incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] RE: Cygwin cannot find -lstd12d
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:44:04 GMT
Farid Zaripov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:36 PM
>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Cygwin cannot find -lstd12d
>>
>> Farid Zaripov wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:29 PM
>>>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Cygwin cannot find -lstd12d
>>>>
>> I have one fundamental issue with this new patch and that is 
>> the introduction of the OSNAME variable and platform-specific 
>> code into the makefiles. The reason why the OSNAME variable 
>> isn't already there is because the makefiles are designed to 
>> be platform-agnostic and as general as possible. So I would 
>> like to try to find a way to express what we need to do using 
>> a general-purpose mechanism (including introducing new 
>> variable if necessary).
> 
>   I found that ld can link to shared library without the import library
> (but the extension of the shared library should be .dll or .dll.a).
> So we can leave the GNUmakefile.lib and GNUmakefile as is.

Okay, good. I'll wait for a new patch then.

> 
>>>   What else can be improved: the ld on Cygwin appends .exe 
>> suffix to 
>>> the built executable name if that name is not contain '.'. 
>> As a result 
>>> we have the /examples and /bin executables with .exe suffix, and 
>>> /tests executables without that suffix.
>> As was noted yesterday, the periods in file names are the
>> (likely) cause of some problems. Is the missing .exe suffix a 
>> problem when invoking the executables or are you simply 
>> pointing out an inconsistency between the tests and the rest 
>> of our executables?
> 
>   No problems with invoking, just the inconsistency.

Good. I agree it would be nice for the names to be consistent.
Could you create a low severity issue and copy your analysis
into it in case someone ever wonders why they're inconsistent?

Martin

Mime
View raw message