incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Brown <>
Subject Re: [jira] Closed: (STDCXX-16) __rb_tree::operator=() does not store rhs' comparison object in lhs
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:42:28 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> Sent: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:44:27 -0700
> To:
> Subject: Re: [jira] Closed: (STDCXX-16) __rb_tree::operator=() does not
> store rhs' comparison object in lhs
> Farid Zaripov (JIRA) wrote:
>>      [
>> ]
>> Farid Zaripov closed STDCXX-16.
>> -------------------------------
>>> __rb_tree::operator=() does not store rhs' comparison object in lhs
> Do we have a test in the test suite that exercises this? If not,
> the status should stay Resolved until one has been added.
> As we discussed previously, I think it would be useful to start
> adding small test cases corresponding to each Jira issue to our
> regression test suite. Those would be in addition to the general
> tests that already are or will be put in place (duplication of
> tested functionality would be possible).
> I propose tests/regress/stdcxx-NNN as the directory and file
> naming convention for these new tests.
> Comments?

I like how the existing tests are organized by sections in the standard. When working on for
example vector, it's easy to run just the container tests without having to worry about all
the other tests. If the regression tests are in a separate directory people will need to remember
to build and run them in addition to those for whatever it is they happen to be working on.
Would it be possible to put the regression tests in the same directories as the other tests
for the same components?

-- Mark

KEEP SPYWARE OFF YOUR COMPUTER - Protect your computer with Spyware Terminator!
Visit and find out more!

View raw message