incubator-stdcxx-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r521934 - /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/src/STRUCT_TM_IN_WCHAR_H.cpp
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:59:53 GMT
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:13 +0300, Farid Zaripov wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:06 PM
> > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r521934 - 
> > /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/src/STRUCT_TM_IN_WCHAR_H.cpp
> > 
> > >   The my gcc 3.4.4 on cygwin and msvc treats the declaration of the 
> > > function struct_tm_declared as the declaration of the type 
> > struct tm 
> > > also.
> > 
> > I don't understand what you mean. Are you saying the 
> > compilers issue an error for the test cases even when struct 
> > tm is declared or that they do NOT issue an error when the 
> > struct is NOT declared?
>   The compiler do not issue an error if struct is not declared.
> 
>   Moreover, after that declaration type tm can be used in other
> declarations.
> 
> The test below compiled without any errors:

Can we find another way to trigger the error? How about changing
the function to:

  tm* foo (tm *arg) { return arg; }

Martin

> -----------------
> struct tm* foo (struct tm* arg)
> {
>     return arg;
> }
> 
> namespace {
>     using ::tm;
> }
> -----------------
> 
> Farid.


Mime
View raw message