Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Exec utility signal relay
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:51:35 +0200
Message-ID: <F92433E3D38672499C549EB615AFADA0AC06DB@exkiv.kyiv.vdiweb.com>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Exec utility signal relay
Thread-Index: AccadF+5GYTwm4DwSxitqtAAKzFnIQAfQ/YA
From: "Farid Zaripov" <FaridZ@kyiv.vdiweb.com>
To: <stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:sebor@roguewave.com]=20
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:54 AM
> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exec utility signal relay
>=20
> Andrew Black wrote:
> > Greetings all.
> >=20
> > Attached is a patch that aims to resolve an old issue with the exec=20
> > utility on UNIX.  The problem observed is that when a kill=20
> signal is=20
> > sent to the exec utility, the child processes aren't killed.  This=20
> > patch has been tested on Linux IA-32 and HPUX-11.23 on=20
> IA-64 (chosen=20
> > due to previous issues with signals).
>=20
> Looks good to me. Unless Farid objects go ahead and commit it.

  I see no problem.

Farid.