From stdcxx-dev-return-2475-apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Dec 20 06:54:25 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17690 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2006 06:54:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 06:54:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 39298 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2006 06:54:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39284 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2006 06:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39273 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2006 06:54:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:54:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:54:22 -0800 Received: from qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com (qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com [192.168.170.59]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBK6rwIV026013 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:53:58 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([10.70.10.12]) by qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:53:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4588DDBE.8000804@roguewave.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:52:46 -0700 From: Martin Sebor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: failed examples reported as passing with MSVC or vice versa References: <45886202.7080807@roguewave.com> <45887BEF.4080503@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: <45887BEF.4080503@roguewave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2006 06:53:33.0348 (UTC) FILETIME=[90A36E40:01C72403] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Andrew Black wrote: [...] > My reading of this message is that the runall.wsf script failed to > complete a file system command. Unfortunately, I am having difficulties > determining where the failure occurred, as the line number is > meaningless within the context of a text editor. I tend to suspect that > this translates to line 118 of the runall.wsf script. A potential > contributing cause is the permissions of the build directory used by the > nightly testing system. Permissions on Windows? That's something new! Could you look into this theory some more when you have a spare moment? We need to get those builds working at some point in the near future. Thanks! Martin > > --Andrew Black > > Martin Sebor wrote: > >> While going through our MSVC 8.0 jumbled up log I came across >> what looks like incorrect behavior of either the exec utility >> or the Windows infrastructure. What seems to be happening is >> that while exec reports some examples as passing the rest of >> the infrastructure actually says they failed. Below are lines >> from the log relevant to the accumulate.exe example. >> >> Andrew and/or Farid, could you guys look into it to see which >> part of the infrastructure is broken? >> >> Thanks >> Martin >> >> 422>Performing Custom Build Step >> 422>running accumulate.exe >> 422>NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT >> USER SYS REAL >> 422>accumulate.exe 0 0 0.330 >> 422>example output differs from the expected >> 422>example failed! Exit code 0 >> 422>