Greetings All.
As a heads up, I am finding that examples may fail to compare correctly
(leading to all examples failing) due to errors setting child process
limits. I plan to look into resolving this tomorrow.
--Andrew Black
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Andrew Black wrote:
>> Revised ChangeLog.
>
> Okay. I found a couple of typos in the patch that I missed in
> my first review so I fixed them myself and committed the whole
> thing: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=443135
>
> Martin
>
> Here are the typos in case you're wondering (gcc only issues
> a warning for them but other compiler might give an error):
>
> exec.cpp:
>
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@
> }
> }
> }
> -#endif /* _XOPEN_UNIX *//
> +#endif /* _XOPEN_UNIX */
>
> /**
> Entry point to the child process (watchdog) subsystem.
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@
>
> #ifdef _XOPEN_UNIX
> limit_process ();
> -#endif /* _XOPEN_UNIX *//
> +#endif /* _XOPEN_UNIX */
>
> execv (argv [0], argv);
|