Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45447 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 15:19:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 15:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 72213 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2006 15:19:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-stdcxx-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72177 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2006 15:18:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact stdcxx-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72146 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2006 15:18:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:18:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of AntonP@moscow.vdiweb.com designates 195.210.189.132 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.210.189.132] (HELO mail.moscow.vdiweb.com) (195.210.189.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:18:58 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-202) [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:19:31 +0400 Message-ID: <4D6A8407B7AC6F4D95B0E55C4E7C4C6204689276@exmsk.moscow.vdiweb.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-202) [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" Thread-Index: AcaP6jMy/IHaKhUHTduPfZq4en8YVABaxS8w From: "Anton Pevtsov" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Martin, here is the fix to this bug: http://people.apache.org/~antonp/stdcxx06162006/scripts/ With best wishes, Anton Pevtsov -----Original Message----- From: Martin Sebor (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 23:38 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-202) [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202?page=3Dall ] Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-202: -------------------------------- Attachment: log.text The full log file is attached. > [Windows] failed config tests labeled "ok" > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: STDCXX-202 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-202 > Project: C++ Standard Library > Type: Bug > Components: Configuration > Versions: 4.1.3 > Environment: Windows > Reporter: Martin Sebor > Assignee: Anton Pevtsov > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: log.text > > The Windows configuration infrastructure incorrectly labels some=20 > failled tests as passing (i.e., "ok"). The labeling should be consistent across all config tests (i.e., "ok" when a test passes and "no ()" when it fails; is the name of the macro that is #defined in response to the failure; it should be enclosed in parentheses and the whole thing separated from the word "no" by a single space). > ------ Build started: Project: .configure, Configuration: 15d Debug Thread-safe=20 > Dll Win32 ------ > Performing Custom Build Step > Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6 > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved. > Configuring for msvc-7.1 - 15d Debug Thread-safe Dll > Checking if compiler is sane... ok > Checking if linker is sane... ok > Checking if run environment is sane... ok > Checking system architecture ILP32 little endian > Checking for headers...=20 > ... > Checking for ... no (_RWSTD_NO_IEEEFP_H) > Checking for ... no (_RWSTD_NO_PTHREAD_H) > Checking for namespaces ok > ... > Checking for std::vsprintf() in ... ok > Checking for std::snprintf() in ... no _RWSTD_NO_SNPRINTF > ... > checking for atomic operations... ok=20 > checking for bad_alloc copy ctor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_COPY_CTOR > checking for bad_alloc default ctor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DEFAULT_CTOR > checking for bad_alloc dtor... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_DTOR > checking for bad_alloc::what()... ok _RWSTD_NO_BAD_ALLOC_WHAT > ... --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira